Tenney v. STATE COM'N ON ETHICS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a pre-complaint hearing would “add a useless layer of procedure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Glazer v. Com'n on Ethics for Pub. Employees
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-04-04· cited 68×
• North Dakota Commission on Medical Competency v. Racek
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-02-08· cited 30×
• Garner v. FLORIDA COM'N ON ETHICS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-02· cited 6×
• Kinzer v. STATE COM'N ON ETHICS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-10· cited 3×
• Fisher Island Holdings, LLC v. Miami-Dade County Commission on Ethics & Public Trust
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-19· cited 3×
• Garner v. State Commission on Ethics
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-14· cited 2×
• Siplin v. Commission on Ethics
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-25· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. Goguen
  Supreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 1,514×
• Adderley v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1966-11-14· cited 876×
• Hannah v. Larche
  Supreme Court· 1960-06-20· cited 819×
• August v. Bronstein
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 126×
• State v. Wershow
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-02-25· cited 76×
• State v. Dye
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-05-19· cited 74×
• Sandstrom v. Leader
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1979-03-22· cited 36×
• Carricarte v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-06-05· cited 23×
• State v. Lindsay
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-10-24· cited 22×
• Haines v. Askew
  M.D. Florida· 1973-12-11· cited 9×
• State v. Rou
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-11-09· cited 6×