Tennessee Gas Pipeline v. 104 Acres in Prov. Cty.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “requirements in the FERC order arise after ownership of the rights of way are obtained and do not operate as a shield against the exercise of eminent domain power”
• holding that “requirements in the FERC order arise after ownership of the rights of way are obtained and do not operate as a shield against the exercise of eminent domain power”
• noting the “line of decisions holding that landowners have no due process right to notice and a hearing in agency proceedings to determine the need for condemnation”
• “Disputes over the validity of the certificate based on FERC’s failure to require compliance with the [CWA] or state law must be brought to the Commission for rehearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).