Skip to main content
· 11/26/2019

Tennessee Funding, LLC v. William H. Worley

Syllabus

Two parties claim the authority to exercise the declarant's rights under a declaration of restrictive covenants for a residential subdivision. The original declarant, the developer of the subdivision, granted a security interest in all personal property associated with the subdivision, including \contract rights\ and general intangibles, to the bank that financed the subdivision. After the developer defaulted, the bank conducted a public sale of the personalty securing its debt and was the highest bidder at the sale. A few months later, the developer fell into receivership, and the receiver sold the declarant's rights under the declaration to a lot owner \free and clear of all liens and liabilities.\ The bank filed this action seeking a declaratory judgment regarding entitlement to the declarant's rights and damages. The lot owner moved for judgment on the pleadings. The lot owner argued that the bank could not prove a superior claim because it had consented to and subordinated its security interest to the declaration. The bank moved for partial summary judgment on its request for a declaratory judgment. The trial court denied the motion for judgment on the pleadings and granted partial summary judgment to the bank. We affirm.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that all seven circuits to have reached the question, including this circuit, have given same answer
  • declining to construe the lower court’s reliance on Cooper’s remaining sentence in its denial of a compassionate release motion as an independent holding under § 3553(a)
  • applying United States v. Shkambi, 993 F.3d 388, 393 (5th Cir. 2021)
  • “When a district court fails to exercise its discretion based on a misapprehension of the law . . . , this court remands the action to allow the district court to exercise it in the first instance.” (alteration adopted) (quotation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge W. Neal McBrayer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.