Tennant v. Rojas (In Re Tennant)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “notice and a hearing” are required even where the bankruptcy court acts pursuant to “its general powers under Section 105(a)”
• holding that \notice and a hearing\ are required even where the bankruptcy court acts pursuant to \its general powers under Section 105(a)\
• holding that “notice and a hearing” are required even where the bank- ruptcy court acts pursuant to “its general powers under Sec- tion 105(a)”
• holding that “[s]ection 105(a) makes ‘crystal clear’ the court’s power to act sua sponte where no party in interest or the United States trustee has filed a motion to dismiss a bankruptcy case” under § 1307
• affirming a sua sponte dismissal by a bankruptcy court when the debtor failed to timely comply with a deficiency notice issued by the bankruptcy court
• distinguishing between appeal of an order denying a Rule 9024 motion and appeal of a timely Rule 9023 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).