Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause fraud requires a misrepresentation concerning a past or present material fact susceptible of knowledge, statements of prediction, opinion, or ‘puffery’ cannot form the basis of a fraud claim.”
• statements that owning franchise was “good business” and that the franchise would continue for “a long time” were not “untrue statements of material fact ... because they [were] puffery as a matter of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).