Tenenbaum Ex Rel. Tenenbaum v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that child’s Fourth Amendment rights not violated because probable cause existed for emergency removal
• applying same three-part test to claim that removal of child violated parents’ right to substantive due process
• “Requiring a warrant for a mere visual inspection (following an emergency removal based on probable cause
• rejecting notion that no emergency can exist where caseworkers “possess only uncorroborated information from an informant of untested reliability”
• granting summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity because the “events at issue in the present case ... occurred when the law ... was not settled” in January of 1990
• parents’ separation from of their child for single afternoon for medical examination did not significantly infringe fundamental right to live together

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).