TENCZA, JOHN v. ST. ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that 75 seconds used to call for backup might unlawfully prolong the stop, but the record was inadequate to determine if the officer’s purpose was for safety or a dog sniff
• suggesting that 75 seconds used to call for backup might unlawfully prolong the stop, but the record was inadequate to determine if the officer’s purpose was for safety or a dog sniff
• suggesting that seventy-five seconds used to call for backup might unlawfully prolong the stop, but the record was inadequate to determine if the officer’s purpose was for safety or a dog sniff
• seventy-five second extension could unlawfully prolong stop if the purpose of back-up call was to investigate other crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).