Tenafly Eruv Ass'n v. Borough of Tenafly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that residents failed to establish that affixing of lechis to utility poles to create eruv was expressive conduct entitled to First Amendment protection
• explaining that a “reasonable, informed observer” of an eruv “would not perceive an endorsement of Orthodox Judaism”
• explaining that a “reasonable, informed observer” of an eruv “would not perceive an endorsement of Orthodox Judaism”
• holding plaintiffs were likely to succeed on their Free Exercise claim for selective enforcement of a facially neutral ordinance
• concluding that Hurley eliminated the particularized message requirement
• concluding that Hurley eliminated the particularized message requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).