Ten Stary Dom Partnership v. T. Brent Mauro (069079)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[I]t is within the discretion of the board whether to reject [an] application on the ground of [r]es judicata.\
• first citing Smart SMR of N.Y., Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Bd. of Adjustment, 152 N.J. 309, 327 (1998); then citing Leimann v. Bd. of Adjustment of Cranford, 9 N.J. 336, 340 (1952)
• first citing Smart SMR of N.Y., Inc. v. Borough of Fair Lawn Bd. of Adjustment, 152 N.J. 309, 327 (1998), then citing Leimann v. Bd. of Adjustment of Cranford, 9 N.J. 336, 340 (1952)
• “[N]ot every deviation from prescribed bulk standards implicates the same concerns.”
• “[N]ot every deviation from prescribed bulk standards implicates the same concerns.”
• summarizing the purposes of the MLUL

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).