Templeton v. Hurtado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding detailed written findings of fact were required for a finding of criminal contempt
• “We vacate the 30-day sentence and remand for a new hearing on the appropriate sanction for contempt after Templeton is given an opportunity to speak in mitigation.”
• “We vacate the 30- day sentence and remand for a new hearing on the appropriate sanction for contempt after Templeton is given an opportunity to speak in mitigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re the Personal Restraint of Breedlove
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 102×
• In Re Breedlove
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 13×
• State v. Jordan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-08-19· cited 10×
• State Of Washington v. Jonathan Dennington
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-03-30· cited 10×
• Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs. v. Sims
  Washington Supreme Court· 2019-03-14· cited 7×
• State v. Anthony Jason Sims (DSHS-appellant)
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-12-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Head
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-10-08· cited 117×
• In Re the Marriage of James
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-10-09· cited 77×
• Matter of Marriage of Mathews
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-25· cited 72×
• State v. Hobble
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-04-13· cited 65×
• State v. Herzog
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-04-26· cited 25×