Templeton Coal Co., Inc. v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The relevant constitutional question is not whether Plaintiffs in fact made an express contractual ‘promise’ of lifetime health benefits, but rather, whether Congress has plausible grounds upon which to include signatory operators such as Plaintiffs within the Coal Act’s financing scheme.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).