Temples v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was sufficient probable cause for the defendant’s DUI arrest when the evidence showed that the officer smelled the odor of alcohol on the defendant’s breath, the defendant’s eyes were bloodshot and watery, and his breath test was positive for alcohol
• holding that there was sufficient probable cause for the defendant’s DUI arrest when the evidence showed that the officer smelled the odor of alcohol on the defendant’s breath, the defendant’s eyes were bloodshot and watery, and his breath test was positive for alcohol
• odor of alcohol on breath, positive reading on alco-sensor, and bloodshot, watery eyes were sufficient grounds for probable cause
• officer had probable cause to arrest defendant for DUI based on odor of alcohol on defendant’s breath, defendant’s bloodshot and watery eyes, and positive reading from alco-sensor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).