Skip to main content
· 1/19/1989

Temex Energy, Inc. v. Hastie (In Re Amarex, Inc.)

Citations

  • 96 B.R. 330
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1262
  • 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1477
  • 1989 WL 10995

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plan provided that all claims for return of preference payments or fraudulent transfers were preserved and retained for enforcement by reorganized debtor
  • plan provided that all claims for return of preference payments or fraudulent transfers were preserved and retained for enforcement by reorganized debtor
  • “In interpreting the terms of a chapter 11 plan, the general rules of contractual interpretation are to be applied,”
  • ‘[t]he benefit to the unsecured creditors has been defined broadly_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.