· 1/19/1989
Temex Energy, Inc. v. Hastie (In Re Amarex, Inc.)
Citations
- 96 B.R. 330
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1262
- 18 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1477
- 1989 WL 10995
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plan provided that all claims for return of preference payments or fraudulent transfers were preserved and retained for enforcement by reorganized debtor
- plan provided that all claims for return of preference payments or fraudulent transfers were preserved and retained for enforcement by reorganized debtor
- “In interpreting the terms of a chapter 11 plan, the general rules of contractual interpretation are to be applied,”
- ‘[t]he benefit to the unsecured creditors has been defined broadly_”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.