Skip to main content
· 8/29/2005

Federal Case

Citations

  • 421 F.3d 493
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 18582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he relevant question for the BIA when it considers a motion to reopen based on new evidence is not whether that material was available at the time of the hearing before the [IJ], but whether it was available before the BIA itself rendered a final decision in the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.