TELLY ENGRAM v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant did not consent to mistrial where defense counsel repeatedly objected prior to the mistrial order
• finding no consent when, prior to the court’s ruling, defendant clarified that his mistrial motion was a motion for a “mistrial with prejudice”
• “[C]ounsel’s 3 immediate and repeated objections demonstrate that [the defendant] did not consent to the mistrial.”
• “[The defendant] did not consent to the . . . mistrial without prejudice [declared] over defense counsel’s repeated objections.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).