Tellas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was error to deny rule 3.850 motion as successive while appeal from previous 3.850 motion was pending; instead, trial court should have dismissed present motion raising the same claim pending on review for lack of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).