Telephonic, Inc. v. Rosenblum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a clause stating that a contract would be governed by New Mexico laws was insufficient to demonstrate that a California defendant consented in advance to submit to the jurisdiction of New Mexico courts
• stating that the resolution of this issue is to “be determined by the fáets in each case”
• \We have repeatedly equated the `transaction of business' ... with the due process standard of `minimum contacts'....\
• “We have repeatedly equated the ‘transaction of business’... with the due process standard of ‘minimum contacts’.....”
• nonresident defendant was contacted in California by resident plaintiff and parties entered into contract; no jurisdiction over defendant
• nonresident defendant was contacted in California by resident plaintiff and parties entered into contract; no jurisdiction over defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).