Telephone Management Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• generalized figures based on market were not the requisite business-specific information required to establish trade secret
• “Instead, the evidence shows that TMC’s involvement was a bid to act on Goodyear’s behalf. When TMC put the proposal in writing, Goodyear rejected it. Consequently, TMC conferred no benefit.”
• “Plaintiff TMC fails to show facts sufficient to support its claim of unjust enrichment. . . . [N]o material evidence shows that TMC conferred any benefit upon Goodyear.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).