Telephone Equipment Network, Inc. v. Ta/Westchase Place, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Texas’ Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act authorized issuance of temporary injunction barring foreclosure of property subject to fraudulent conveyance claim
• holding that evidence that a debtor defaulted on an obligation shortly after completing the transaction was significant and suggestive of an actual intent to defraud the creditor
• finding that trial court did not abuse discretion by issuing temporary injunction under Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act when evidence tended to support finding of factors listed in section 24.005(b
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when evidence demonstrated that an injunction was necessary to prevent action that would essentially render debtor insolvent, judgment-proof, or an empty corporate shell thereby giving creditor no adequate remedy at law
• finding that trial court did not abuse discretion by issuing temporary injunction under Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act when evidence tended to support finding of factors listed in section 24.005(b
• finding evidence of five “badges of fraud,” concluding there was sufficient evidence of fraudulent transfer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).