W.D. Virginia· 8/1/2011

Teleguz v. Kelly

Citations

824 F. Supp. 2d 672
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83884
2011 WL 3319885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

examining a procedurally defaulted claim on the merits and concluding, “I do not find this issue significant enough to excuse Teleguz’s procedural default”
examining a procedur- ally defaulted claim on the merits and concluding, \I do not find this issue significant enough to excuse Teleguz’s proce- dural default\
“Teleguz has failed to show cause for the default and ... has not shown a fundamental miscarriage of justice that would excuse the default.”
“Teleguz has not shown cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of justice to excuse the default.”
\Teleguz has not shown cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of justice to excuse the default.\
“Teleguz has failed to show cause and prejudice or a miscarriage of justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.