Teleglobe USA, Inc. v. BCE Inc. (In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the debtor was not cash-flow insolvent in part because it could rely on financial support from its parent company
• “the amendments to Rule 26 did not change the Third Circuit’s fundamental decision: that the work product doctrine articulated in Rule 26(b)(3) is not trumped by the need to disclose information contained in other provisions of that Rule.”
• only factual data must be produced pursuant to Rule 26(b)(2)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).