Telecom Italia S.P.A. v. L-3 Communications Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “implicit in Rule 4004(b)(2
• “[I]mplicit in Rule 4004(b)(2) is the requirement that a party . . . demonstrate some degree of diligence in investigating the debtor’s financial affairs prior to the expiration of the deadline for objecting to discharge . . . .”
• “[Disallowance of a claim owing to a creditor’s failure to file a timely proof of claim does not negate the claim itself. It simply means that the creditor may be unable to receive a distribution from the chapter 7 trustee under 11 U.S.C. § 726.”
• \[D]isallowance of a claim owing to a creditor's failure to file a timely proof of claim does not negate the claim itself. It simply means that the creditor may be unable to receive a distribution from the chapter 7 trustee under 11 U.S.C. § 726.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).