Tele-Count Engineers, Inc. v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting 20 that “by instructing the jury on appellant’s burden to establish that the confidential nature ‘of the 21 forms’ was ‘made known’ to [the defendant] by appellant, the trial court properly focused attention 22 upon the element of an understanding between the parties”
• idea must be confidential and novel to warrant breach of confidence protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).