Tektronix, Inc. v. Conde Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying request for travel expenses that were listed on a billing statement but not otherwise documented
• reducing the amount sought for photocopies where it was not clear whether the sum requested included multiple copies of the same documents for the convenience of counsel
• “The burden is therefore upon the party seeking costs to provide adequate documentation of its costs, and a failure to do so may result in the costs being reduced or denied.”
• “Except in rare circumstances in which some important state interest is implicated, . . . the awarding of costs in an action in federal court is controlled by federal law, specifically Rule 54 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1821 and 1920.” (citations omitted)
• “Except in rare circumstances in which some important state interest is implicated . . . , the awarding of costs in an action in federal court is controlled by federal law, specifically Rule 54 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1821 and 1920.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).