Skip to main content
· 5/6/1994

Tekansky v. Pearson

Citations

  • 635 N.E.2d 605
  • 263 Ill. App. 3d 759
  • 200 Ill. Dec. 266
  • 1994 Ill. App. LEXIS 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to consider facts not contained in the record on appeal
  • denying motion to strike but disregarding any improper information in all the briefs
  • refusing to consider facts not contained in the record on appeal
  • any doubts raised by missing evidence are to be resolved against the appellant
  • any doubts raised by missing evidence are to be resolved against the appellant
  • any doubts raised by missing evidence are to be resolved against the appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.