· 5/6/1994
Tekansky v. Pearson
Citations
- 635 N.E.2d 605
- 263 Ill. App. 3d 759
- 200 Ill. Dec. 266
- 1994 Ill. App. LEXIS 683
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to consider facts not contained in the record on appeal
- denying motion to strike but disregarding any improper information in all the briefs
- refusing to consider facts not contained in the record on appeal
- any doubts raised by missing evidence are to be resolved against the appellant
- any doubts raised by missing evidence are to be resolved against the appellant
- any doubts raised by missing evidence are to be resolved against the appellant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.