Tejera v. Budget Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing sniff of mail parcel from heightened expectation of privacy seen in Thomas
• declining to address implication by state, which was not briefed, that defendant may not have had standing to challenge police search of parcel that contained illegal drugs
• distinguishing sniff of mail parcel from heightened expectation of privacy seen in Thomas
• appellate courts ordinarily do not consider constitutional issues unless absolutely necessary to decision of case
• appellate courts ordinarily do not consider constitutional issues unless absolutely necessary to decision of case
• party \who seek[s] consideration of unpreserved constitutional claims [on appeal] ... bear[s] the burden of establishing their entitlement to such review under the guidelines enumerated in Golding \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).