Tejas Power Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Nos. 89-1267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 602 “provide[s] that [FERC] may approve a contested settlement ... only if ‘the record contains substantial evidence upon which to base a reasoned decision or the Commission determines there is no genuine issue of material fact’ ”
• holding that Rule 602 \provide[s] that [FERC] may approve a contested settlement ... only if 'the record contains substantial evidence upon which to base a reasoned decision or the Commission determines there is no genuine issue of material fact' \
• concluding substantial evidence did not support a finding that the market was competitive where the Commission had made no finding regarding market power
• the Commission must exercise its independent judgment in determining whether a proposed settlement is consistent with NGA requirements
• \[T]his court has consistently required the Commission to give weight to the contracts and settlements of the parties before it.\
• the Commission must exercise its independent judgment in determining whether a proposed settlement is consistent with NGA requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).