Indiana Court of Appeals· 8/9/1988
Teitge v. Remy Const. Co., Inc.
Citations
- 526 N.E.2d 1008
- 1988 Ind. App. LEXIS 571
- 1988 WL 83224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an employee fell through a skylight on a school’s roof while walking backward and dragging metal to a salvage area
- applying the same rationale to multiple prime contractors
- “[J]udgment on the evidence is proper only where there is a lack of evidence of probative value upon one or more of the factual issues necessary to support a verdict, and no reasonable inference in favor of the plaintiff can be drawn from this evidence.”
- “[J]udgment on the evidence is proper only where there is a lack of evidence of probative value upon one or more of the factual issues necessary to support a verdict, and no reasonable inference in favor of the plaintiff can be drawn from this evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Buchanan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Robert Spierer v. Corey RossmanSeventh Circuit· 2015-08-14· cited 172×
- Delta Tau Delta, Beta Alpha Chapter v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-07-12· cited 99×
- Merrill v. Knauf Fiber Glass GmbHIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-07-29· cited 81×
- Ramon v. Glenroy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-03-03· cited 67×
- Medtech Corp. v. Indiana Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-06-20· cited 51×
- James C. Purcell v. Old National BankIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-07-31· cited 45×
- Stumpf v. Hagerman Construction Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-04-02· cited 38×
- Robinson v. KinnickIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-11-30· cited 38×
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. East Chicago Sanitary DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-01-29· cited 38×
- Pelak v. Indiana Industrial Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-07-25· cited 33×
- Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. NickolickIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-05-30· cited 28×
- Vaughn v. Daniels Co.(West Virginia), Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-11-04· cited 27×
- Eck & Associates, Inc. v. Alusuisse Flexible Packaging, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-10-26· cited 23×
- McGarrity v. Berlin Metals, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-08-06· cited 20×
- Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. GarrettIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-03-22· cited 17×
- Daugherty v. Fuller Engineering Service Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-06-17· cited 14×
- Associated Aviation Underwriters v. George Koch Sons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-06-22· cited 12×
- Underwriting Members of Lloyds of London v. United Home Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals· 1990-01-29· cited 11×
- Pickett v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-04-15· cited 9×
- Riffle v. Knecht Excavating, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-02-22· cited 8×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1983-01-11· cited 109×
- Perry v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1982-03-25· cited 92×
- Walters v. Kellam & Foley, Mussett, Nicholas & Stevenson, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1977-02-17· cited 70×
- Phillips v. United Engineers & Constructors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1986-12-09· cited 27×
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. RamseyIndiana Court of Appeals· 1982-09-20· cited 26×
- Lukowski v. Vecta Educational Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-03-27· cited 25×
- Dibortolo v. Metropolitan School District of Washington TownshipIndiana Court of Appeals· 1982-10-07· cited 23×
- Wyler v. Lilly Varnish Co.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1969-12-04· cited 19×
- Thomas v. HennesIndiana Court of Appeals· 1922-05-12· cited 15×
- Beird v. Figg & Muller Engineers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-12-30· cited 11×
- Indiana State Highway Commission v. Daily Express, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-02-18· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.