Teitelbaum v. Chater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that any ambiguity as to retroactive application of new disability rules “is more likely due to imperfect draftsmanship and not Congressional intent to allow the Commissioner to ‘fill in the gaps’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).