Teitelbaum, R. v. PGCB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “ignorance of the law alone is not sufficient to warrant equitable tolling”
• holding that “ignorance of the law alone is not sufficient to warrant equitable tolling”
• holding that “ignorance of the law alone is not sufficient to warrant equitable tolling”
• recognizing that ignorance of the law alone does not warrant equitable tolling
• noting that petitioner’s “ignorance of the filing deadline given the unstable and unsettled nature of AEDPA at the crucial time of the mistake was reasonable and supports her argument for tolling”
• holding tolling applied where claimant provided inadequate notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).