Tefera v. Onewest Bank, Fsb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff’s “single conclusory reference to fraud misses the mark for notice pleading under Rule 8, let alone the heightened pleading standard required for fraud claims under Rule 9(b)”
• concluding that plaintiff’s “single conclusory reference to fraud misses the mark for notice pleading under Rule 8, let alone the heightened pleading standard required for fraud claims under Rule 9(b)”
• explaining that a district court court “may also consider documents in the public record . . . as well as the existence of other litigation, including bankruptcy proceedings.”
• “[The plaintiff’s] single conclusory reference to fraud misses the mark for notice pleading under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] Rule 8, let alone the heightened pleading standard required for fraud claims under Rule 9(b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).