Teets v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “MDHHS is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity against Plaintiffs’ suit because it is a state agency”
• reiterating the holding in Ladd, 971 F.3d at 579-80, that Knick did not provide an exception to sovereign immunity for takings claims
• finding that state governors are entitled to immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).