Teeters v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prior criminal convictions “have already been proven beyond a reasonable doubt and are thus exempt from the Apprendi rule”
• opining that the \in need of correctional or rehabilitative treatment that can best be provided by commitment to a penal facility\ aggravator does not implicate Blakely when it can be said to be derivative of the defendant's criminal history
• opining that the \in need of correctional or rehabilitative treatment that can best be provided by commitment to a penal facility\ aggravator does not implicate Blakely when it can be said to be derivative of the defendant's criminal history
• suggesting aggravating circumstances that defendant was on probation at the time of the offense is \problematic\ under Blakely, but not deciding whether aggra-vator was improper where another valid, aggravating cireumstance justified enhanced sentence
• suggesting aggravating circumstances that defendant was on probation at the time of the offense is \problematic\ under Blakely, but not deciding whether aggravator was improper where another valid, aggravating circumstance justified enhanced sentence
• suggesting aggravating circumstances that defendant was on probation at the time of the offense is \problematic\ under Blakely, but not deciding whether aggravator was improper where another valid, aggravating circumstance justified enhanced sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).