Teeny v. Haertl Constructors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that material suppliers who worked off site were not covered by the ORS 87.021(3)(b) exception by virtue of the fact that they had sent employees to the job site to take measurements
• “In interpreting a statute, this court’s duty is to discern the intent of the legislature.”
• subcontractors’ liens were invalid when subcontractors did not provide notice required by ORS 87.021(1)
• failure to provide notice required by ORS 87.021(1) renders lien invalid
• statingthis court’s role in interpreting a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).