Teen v. Mandour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding certain corporate officers personally liable because they signed the agreement both in their corporate capacity and in their individual capacities
• “[T]he manifestation of a party’s intention rather than the actual or real intention is ordinarily controlling.”
• “[I]t is fundamental that a benefit flowing to a third person or legal entity constitutes a sufficient consideration for the promise of another.”
• “Absent fraud or unconscionability, the adequacy of consideration is not a proper subject for judicial scrutiny.”
• “the slightest consideration is sufficient to support the most onerous obligation; the inadequacy ... [is] not for the court” to consider
• corporate officers not bound by agreement they signed on behalf of corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).