Teel v. McCord

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a claimant’s entitlement to PPD benefits commenced when the claimant first returned to work after his 1974 injury — not after subsequent intermittent healing period or after he finally “returned to work for good” in 1981 after a series of surgeries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).