Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 10/14/1947
Teel v. Harlan
Citations
- 199 Okla. 268
- 185 P.2d 695
- 1947 OK 302
- 1947 Okla. LEXIS 681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the memorandum of the contract required by the Statute of Frauds may be made subsequently to the making of the contract itself ... and even after an alleged breach has occurred.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bayless, Corn, Davison, Gibson, Hurst, Riley, Welch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationTenth Circuit· 1997-11-25· cited 980×
- Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-12-04· cited 38×
- Sperling v. MarlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1998-07-16· cited 30×
- In Re Blaydes' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1950-03-21· cited 18×
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Dan W. ShafferTenth Circuit· 1962-12-10· cited 15×
- GFF Corporation v. Associated WholesaleTenth Circuit· 1997-11-25
- Thomas v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1952-11-06
- Weber v. WeberOhio Supreme Court· 1960-05-04
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.