Teel v. Hamilton-Wenham Regional School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the facts related by the plaintiff, “while overwhelmingly demonstrable of his desire to live in Hamilton, conclusively show that he and his family actually reside in Essex”
• determining a father's domicil for purpose of resolving a dispute over where children could attend public school
• determining a father’s domicil for purpose of resolving a dispute over where children could attend public school
• \it may generally be said that one resides in the jurisdiction in which he sleeps\
• “it may generally be said that one resides in the jurisdiction in which he sleeps”
• in case raising issue of children’s residence for purposes of school attendance, Appeals Court recites facts “as they appear from the parties’ stipulation and [plaintiffl’s testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).