Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the petitioner “could not obtain judi- cial review of the [agency’s] 1991 decision by seeking review of the * * ” decision
• concluding that the petitioner “could not obtain judi- cial review of the [agency’s] 1991 decision by seeking review of the * * ” decision
• “The water right is perfected when the water actually is put fully to a beneficial use.”
• “Oregon’s current scheme of ground and surface water allocation is rooted in the doctrine of prior appropriation for a beneficial use.”
• “Oregon's current scheme of ground and surface water allocation is rooted in the doctrine of prior appropriation for a beneficial use.”
• the question whether a letter issued by the watermaster was a “final order” determined whether the circuit court had jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).