Tedrick v. Hiner
Citations
- 61 Ill. 189
Syllabus
<p>1. Services as attorney—whether compensation can be recovered for, without license to practice. Where a party, representing himself to be an attorney, was employed by another as such, and it appeared he had no license to practice as an attorney, and in all he did acted as a regularly licensed attorney, it was held, he could not recover for the services so rendered.</p> <p>2. Allegations and proofs—in action against several. In an action ex contractu against several, there can be no recovery unless a joint promise or liability is proved.</p>
Judges: Breese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.