Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 2/25/1986

Tedesco v. Mishkin

Citations

  • 629 F. Supp. 1474
  • 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1511
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • restraining further communications by defendant-attorney was valid because court’s interest in proper conduct of class action was substantial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edelstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.