S.D. New York· 2/25/1986
Tedesco v. Mishkin
Citations
- 629 F. Supp. 1474
- 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1511
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28904
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- restraining further communications by defendant-attorney was valid because court’s interest in proper conduct of class action was substantial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edelstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.