Tedder R. Million v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that applying a new statute of limitations period to revive previously moribund claims would affect the substantive rights of both the plaintiff and the defen dant
• concluding equitable tolling did not apply and the plaintiff failed to timely file
• concluding equitable tolling did not apply and the plaintiff failed to timely file
• “The doctrine of equitable tolling cannot be applied simply because the plaintiff chose to examine his mail on a weekly basis rather than as it arrived. . . . Had plaintiff acted diligently, he could have filed his action in a timely manner.”
• \[t]he filing requirements of Title VII\ are \condition[s] precedent\
• Second Am. Compl. ¶ 10

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).