Ted LIMBEROPOULOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it appears that CAPA may have been 18 preempted by VARA.”
• holding “dismissal without prejudice did not confer 18 prevailing party status upon the defendant” as “dismissal without prejudice does not alter 19 the legal relationship of the parties because the defendant remains subject to the risk of 20 re-filing”
• step-four analysis of former “fruitstand owner-operator” turns on ability to meet demands of “clerk of a [similar] self-service store”
• applying Mathews factors in immigration detention context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).