Ted Harrison Oil Co., Inc. v. Dokka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the party seeking to have the corporate entity disregarded has to come forward with a substantial showing that the corporation is really a dummy or a sham for a dominating personality”
• noting that insolvency of the debtor corporation is relevant to veil piercing analysis
• piercing corporate veil will impose personal liability on a shareholder found to be alter ego of corporation
• finding a “complete lack of corporate formalities” where “[n]o records were kept and the company did not hold formal shareholder or director meetings.”
• piercing corporate veil will impose personal liability on a shareholder found to be alter ego of corporation
• finding a “complete lack of corporate formalities” where “[n]o records were kept and the com- pany did not hold formal shareholder or director meet- ings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).