Ted Bradford v. Joseph Scherschligt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating claim alleging fabrication of evidence in the same way as claim of malicious prosecution for accrual purposes
• analogizing a fabrication of evidence claim to malicious prosecution for accrual purposes
• finding due process claim related 2 to evidence tampering had yet to accrue, despite overturning of plaintiff’s conviction, where 3 plaintiff was retried for the same crime and the state could have used the same evidence against 4 the plaintiff
• “the right at issue in a Devereaux claim is the right to be free from criminal charges based on a claim of deliberately fabricated evidence
• claim for deliberate fabrication of evidence accrues when charges are fully and finally resolved and can no longer be brought against defendant; here, acquittal at retrial.
• claim for deliberate fabrication of evidence accrues when charges are fully and finally resolved and can no longer be brought against defendant; here, acquittal at retrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McDonough v. Smith
  Supreme Court· 2019-06-20· cited 578×
• Ignacio Lanuza v. Jonathan Love
  Ninth Circuit· 2018-08-14· cited 112×
• Wright v. City of Philadelphia
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-01-17· cited 34×
• McDonough v. Smith
  Second Circuit· 2018-08-03· cited 28×
• Yu v. Idaho State Univ.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2019-07-10· cited 5×
• Yu v. ID State University
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2019-07-10

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Heck v. Humphrey
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
• Wallace v. Kato
  Supreme Court· 2007-02-21· cited 4,908×
• Devereaux v. Abbey
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 1,256×
• Owens v. Baltimore City State's Attorneys Office
  Fourth Circuit· 2014-09-24· cited 858×
• Esau Awabdy v. City of Adelanto Scott Burnell Ted Hartz Richard Althouse, Michael Sakamoto, Does I-X, Inclusive
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-05-20· cited 353×
• Frederick Jackson v. Michael Barnes
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-04-15· cited 319×
• Knox v. Davis
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-08-08· cited 216×
• Johnson v. Dossey
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-02-12· cited 171×
• Hughes Anderson Bagley, Jr. v. Cmc Real Estate Corporation, AKA Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Donald E. Mitchell Norman W. Prins
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-01-22· cited 159×
• Clipper Exxpress v. Rocky Mountain Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-04-19· cited 153×
• Matthew Tarabochia v. Mickey Adkins
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-09-09· cited 85×
• Pedro Rosales-Martinez v. Colby Palmer
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-06-03· cited 83×
• K.W. Ex Rel. D.W. v. Armstrong
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-06-05· cited 59×
• McSherry v. City of Long Beach
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-09-08· cited 45×
• Jeffrey A. Walker v. David Jastremski
  Second Circuit· 1998-11-03· cited 32×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Bradford
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-14· cited 17×