Skip to main content
· 9/25/2015

Ted Bradford v. Joseph Scherschligt

Citations

  • 803 F.3d 382
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16962
  • 2015 WL 5637534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating claim alleging fabrication of evidence in the same way as claim of malicious prosecution for accrual purposes
  • analogizing a fabrication of evidence claim to malicious prosecution for accrual purposes
  • finding due process claim related 2 to evidence tampering had yet to accrue, despite overturning of plaintiff’s conviction, where 3 plaintiff was retried for the same crime and the state could have used the same evidence against 4 the plaintiff
  • “the right at issue in a Devereaux claim is the right to be free from criminal charges based on a claim of deliberately fabricated evidence
  • claim for deliberate fabrication of evidence accrues when charges are fully and finally resolved and can no longer be brought against defendant; here, acquittal at retrial.
  • claim for deliberate fabrication of evidence accrues when charges are fully and finally resolved and can no longer be brought against defendant; here, acquittal at retrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, Hawkins, Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.