Techsnabexport, Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i), where continuation of investigation would cause harm even if final determination was not adverse
• “The court may not grant preliminary relief based upon unsupported allegations .... Allegations of harm to potential future business relations are too speculative to constitute irreparable harm.”
• affidavits averring challenges to the establishment of long term business relationships were “too speculative to constitute irreparable harm”
• “As plaintiffs have the burden on this issue, the hardships are presumed to balance.”
• “The court may not grant preliminary relief based upon unsupported allegations.... Allegations of harm to potential future business relations are too speculative to constitute irreparable harm.”
• “[jurisdiction exists to hear challenges to the validity of antidumping proceedings prior to their completion if the opportunity for full relief may be lost by awaiting the final determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).