Technologists, Inc. v. Mir's Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the FAA’s marshal requirement has been displaced by contemporary Rule 4
• holding that service by mail was insufficient under Rule 4(h)(1)(B)
• observing that the FAA’s marshal requirement “is an artifact of the era in which United States marshals were the default servers of process in federal courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).