Seventh Circuit· 1/7/1966
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc.
Citations
- 356 F.2d 442
- 10 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1332
- 148 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 181
- 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7593
Judges: Hastings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- John Staren and David Henner v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1976-02-03· cited 156×
- Giordano v. LeeEighth Circuit· 1970-12-04· cited 126×
- The Scam Instrument Corporation v. Control Data CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1972-04-07· cited 47×
- Devex Corporation v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1967-07-12· cited 34×
- Grantham v. McGraw-Edison Co.Seventh Circuit· 1971-05-07· cited 32×
- Charles E. Ortman, Jr. v. Stanray CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1967-01-03· cited 30×
- Research Corporation v. Nasco Industries, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1974-12-23· cited 29×
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1967-02-17· cited 22×
- International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, District No. 8, Aflcio v. J. L. Clark CompanySeventh Circuit· 1972-12-29· cited 17×
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Electronics Corp.C.D. California· 1968-08-08· cited 16×
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1973-08-27· cited 11×
- Technograph Printed Circuits Ltd. v. Martin-Marietta Corp.Fourth Circuit· 1973-02-20· cited 9×
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1967-02-17· cited 6×
- Ethyl Corporation v. Borden, Inc.Third Circuit· 1970-06-05· cited 5×
- Agrashell, Inc. v. BERNARD SIROTTA COMPANYE.D. New York· 1968-03-06· cited 5×
- Green v. Aerosol Research CompanyN.D. Illinois· 1968-07-16· cited 5×
- Unnamed caseSeventh Circuit· 1966-03-22· cited 4×
- Doctors Hospital of Hyde Park, Inc. v. Desnick (In Re Doctors Hospital of Hyde Park, Inc.)N.D. Illinois· 2005-10-17· cited 3×
- Harris Bank Naperville v. Morse Shoe, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1989-07-18· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1971-01-12· cited 1×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court· 1929-10-14· cited 407×
- Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court· 1936-03-30· cited 184×
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1960-01-14· cited 116×
- Smith v. HallSupreme Court· 1937-04-26· cited 106×
- Montreal Securities, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 68×
- A R Inc. v. Electro-Voice, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1962-12-28· cited 50×
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.D. Maryland· 1963-05-27· cited 49×
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd., and Technograph Printed Electronics, Incorporated v. Bendix CorporationFourth Circuit· 1964-01-17· cited 38×
- Marie Magee and Donald F. Guilliams v. The Coca-Cola Company, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Of Chicago, Inc. And Chicago Concessions, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1956-05-16· cited 30×
- Davison Chemical Corp. v. Joliet Chemicals, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1950-03-07· cited 25×
- Elie P. Aghnides and Chase Brass and Copper Company, Inc. v. Orloff W. Holden and Marguerite Holden, Doing Business as Knickerbocker Rubber CompanySeventh Circuit· 1955-11-03· cited 25×
- Gold Seal Importers, Inc. v. Morris White Fashions, Inc.Second Circuit· 1941-12-23· cited 25×
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. General Electric Co.Seventh Circuit· 1950-06-28· cited 16×
- Gold Seal Importers, Inc. v. Westerman-Rosenberg, Inc.Second Circuit· 1943-01-25· cited 16×
- Lektophone Corp. v. Miller Bros.D. Delaware· 1930-01-23· cited 12×
- Magee v. Coca-Cola Co.N.D. Illinois· 1955-01-18· cited 10×
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Butte & Superior Copper Co.D. Montana· 1916-11-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.