Technisand, Inc. v. Melton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Pursuant to the Survival Act, Patty’s products liability claim against Technisand terminated at her death; only the [Wrongful Death Act] claim survived.”
• “The claim here is that Patty died from personal injuries allegedly caused by Technisand. As such, once Patty died, [the representative of Patty’s] claim was a claim for wrongful death.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sharon Gill, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Estate of Gale Gill v. Evansville Sheet Metal Works, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 82×
• Virginia E. Alldredge and Julia A. Luker, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Venita Hargis v. The Good Samaritan Home, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-01-31· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Degussa Corp. v. Mullens
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-16· cited 36×
• Ellenwine v. Fairley
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2006-05-03· cited 23×
• Randolph v. Methodist Hospitals, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-08-13· cited 12×
• Newkirk v. Bethlehem Woods Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, LLC
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2008-12-24· cited 4×

Other cases named Technisand, Inc. v. Melton

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Technisand, Inc. v. Melton
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2008-01-17