Tecco v. Iconic Labs, L.L.C.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2041
Syllabus
Summary judgment breach of contract executory contract review partnership essential terms reasonably certain and clear. Upheld trial court's decision to grant summary judgment in favor of appellees on appellant's claim for breach of contract and/or breach of an executory contract to form a partnership. Appellant failed to put forth evidence demonstrating a meeting of the minds occurred regarding the essential terms of an executory agreement to form a partnership, and a review of the record showed the essential terms of any contemplated agreement were not reasonably certain and clear. An appellate court limits its review to issues actually decided by the trial court.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kostelnik v. HelperOhio Supreme Court· 2002-07-03· cited 349×
- Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-02-26· cited 250×
- Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-09-29· cited 194×
- Perlmuter Printing Co. v. Strome, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 1976-04-23· cited 176×
- Argabrite v. NeerOhio Supreme Court· 2016-12-27· cited 125×
- M.H. v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-11-20· cited 87×
- Lycan v. Cleveland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-02-09· cited 51×
- Thermodyn Corp. v. 3M Co.N.D. Ohio· 2008-12-17· cited 31×
- BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. RHIEL, Trustee.Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-20· cited 18×
- Tritsch v. BachOhio Court of Appeals· 1949-10-24· cited 4×
- Bayer v. NachtrabOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-19· cited 2×
- Walker v. StateOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.